INTRODUCTION: The need to deliver a high-quality edit under constrictions of timeline and budget requires that we approach complex, multi-author documents strategically. Is the initial estimate of editorial time still accurate? Are a specific template, style guide, and reference format required? IDENTIFY PRIORITIES: If there is insufficient time for a thorough edit, ask the writers to identify editorial priorities Develop a style sheet to document project-specific idiosyncrasies Keep a list of consistency searches to perform Do an initial scan of the document to identify obvious discrepancies in writing styles (e.g., different terminology for the same concept) USE TECHNOLOGY: Use a template or use Word styles to increase formatting efficiency Consider using reference management software (e.g., EndNote) Use macros and wildcards for common editorial tasks (e.g., checking abbreviations; finding and replacing text) SUMMARIZE THE EDIT: Describe what was accomplished in the time available Make a list of tasks that should be completed during subsequent drafts CONCLUSIONS: Providing a comprehensive review of complex, multi-author documents while meeting project timelines and budgets requires that we clarify expectations with writers, identify editorial priorities, and maximize the use of technology.
CLARIFY EXPECTATIONS:
